Home

Advertisement

Customize
October 2007   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

MY TWO BEST ENTRIES IN SPRING 07 ARE

Posted on 2007.10.25 at 11:13
 
Week 7
Posted on 2007.09.08 at 13:54
Week 7. b)
 
Describe the impact on you of your favorite piece of writing from either Woolf, Mansfield, or Lawrence.
 
“The Snake” by D. H. Lawrence had a great impact on me and my thoughts. This poem describes humanity to the finest point. It represents our individual actions and thoughts and how we live our lives.
 
In the poem, the facts are that the snake is bad. That Lawrence was taught he must kill the snake. Now he must.
These are the facts but yet Lawrence does not, instead challenging his thoughts and teachings and in the end despising himself. He challenges education directly. He questions himself and his past.
“The voice of my education said to me
He must be killed”.
Yet Lawrence does not intend to carry this out. This got me thinking of others in the world. We often wonder why people act the way they do. I had been the type of person that believed if a person commits murder or a horrific crime then no matter what the person can not have any reasons except for self defense. But yet due to this poem it opened my eyes to the importance of education. Could these people have been educated to act like this? The poem also raises the issue that we are threatened by what we don’t understand. It shows humanity’s strive for more knowledge. If we felt we had learnt all we needed then there would be no more need for new technology or the strive to explain the unknown. Then would we be content and live in harmony. Even Lawrence doesn’t give the answer to this, but he does find peace in the enemy, the snake.
 
Also why do we act in a way that is acceptable to society and if we don’t should we be seen as outsiders. Lawrence challenges this. He is suppose to kill the snake but yet doesn’t. Should we see Lawrence as an outsider for not killing the snake?
“Was it cowardice, that I dared not kill him?
Was it perversity, that I longed to talk to him?
Was it humility, to feel so honoured?
I felt so honoured”
 This raises the issue of do we have the right to judge people because they are not acting as what we consider normal. After all who judges what is normal. Again it related to education. So education affects society’s acceptance of what is normal. So education limits our actions in order to be seen as normal. So education constraints us.
WAIT… That doesn’t seem right!  
But according the Lawrence it makes sense. This is the reason why this poem had such an impact on me.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Week 2
Posted on 2007.08.04 at 12:43
Current Mood: thankful
 
Which poem introduced in the first two weeks has left a strong impression on you?
 
The poem that once I read I just had to read again, not so much for analysis, but more for the strongest and touching impression, is The Soldier by Rupert Brooke.
I believe that when one reads or watches war related sources they can have two feelings. One expressing the horrors of war and the other expressing the appreciation of the brave souls that went and took part. The Soldier is in fact showing the appreciation a soldier has on his mother country. The fact that a soldier was so willing to die for his country and even to write about this is a true testament to the bravery of these men and women.  
One line that really stood out was “In that rich earth a richer dust concealed”. This got me thinking of land all over the world where men were turned into dust which consumed the land. While they were fighting for such important land what impressed me was that “a richer dust concealed”. This shows the importance of human life and those that have died fighting for their country.
The soldier in the poem is expressing their love of England and expressing that his bravery was developed from his mother country. His stating why he is willing to die for his country. There is a sense of wanting to experience what he has in the past, just one more time. The stanza that describes England’s beauty brings a sense of reality and hope in a difficult and dangerous situation, and maybe this hope is just what the soldiers may have needed for the courage in each day to face machinery that could end their lives at any time.
This poem touches all emotions of the reader. It begins with patriotism and despair that the soldier knows and accepts that they may die, then appreciation of the land at home and perhaps the longing to see this beautiful land once more, then a sense of calmness with a religious presence.
 
 
 
  A war poem by Christopher Azzopardi
 
When reading poems about war I cannot help but to think of my nannu (grandfather). When I was a kid I would sit and listen to him recall stories that he experienced during the war when he was a kid in Malta. I was amazed of what he had to experience at such at a young age. So I decided to write a poem about this.
 
Is it just?
 
Is it right what you had to see
The horrors of war, the gore
The stories that you told me
Will forever stay with me
 
For the bravery not only of the soldiers
But the citizens not only of the adults
But of the children.
 
Running from playing football
Straight underground
The sounds of bombs falling
Feeling the ground shake
Running to the strongest point.
 
Would you be alive now
If not for that old women
Whom died when the glass fell
All over her when she stood right behind who?
Would you be alive if not for
That person who had their leg torn off
When caught under the door.
Would I be alive now?
 
But you are and I shall listen
Sit there with anticipation for the next story
Sit in awe of the bravery
Wanting to hear more
Full of admiration
 

Week 9 Comment on Carmel’s rant on sexism

Posted on 2007.09.27 at 12:08
Firstly I would like to say the sport “soccer” does not exist. It is called FOOTBALL. If you don’t believe me Football Australia governs the sport in Australia and Football NSW governs it in NSW.
 
Secondary I did watch the womens world cup. I watched every game that was on SBS. I am a mad football fan, and must say that SBS mentioned about the womens world cup numerous times. It was on the world game’s website as well as on the world game show on Sunday’s at 5pm.
Any football fan would be aware that the Matilda’s did better than what was expected. After all they did manage the  2 goals against Brazil who had no conceded one since that game.
 
I understand your view that women don’t get the recognition they deserve. But in the end it is who turns up to watch the game to see how successful it is. Compare the women’s game to the men’s game. The men’s game is far more attractive to watch in a football sense. There are far more teams in the men’s countrys team then womens. This is why the mens is such a global celebration and recognition as over 200 countries take part.
 
I too am disappointed by the mens team form. They have failed to reach the heights and promise of the world cup.  I am aware that women do not get the recognition they deserve. But try not to blame SBS. After all if you look at the history of the mens world cup it took far more than 20 years for the game to really take control and for the celebrations to be where they are.
 
The reason why the mens world cup was so well known was firstly due to the history of the mens football team. Only qualifiying once before and the recent history with Uruguay meant there was an increase in notice. Also it was the one of the very few time we got a international qualified coach who was well known and a tactical genius. Also as I mentioned in the end it is up to the public. If every one in the street talked about the matilda’s then more people would have known.  
 
I understand and totally agree with your comments about the Matilda’s not getting enough recognition, but it is more of a social problem rather than a media one. I, too, must congratulate the Matilda’s and must congratulate you on your passion for the best sport in the world
 
P.S please use the term football.

Week 9

Posted on 2007.09.22 at 15:22
Week 9. a)
 
How relevant do you think Orwell’s views on the abuse of language are to today’s society?
 
I believe George Orwell’s views on the abuse of language are relevant to today. I believe that due to new technology such as the object I am typing on and mobile phones that our use of language is decreasing in structure. Most of us write in “fone language”; buy using lol, brb, ty, dw etc, let alone actually changing the spelling of words such as fone, wen, hav etc. Orwell gives five rules of proper use of language.
1) Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2) Never use a long word where a short one will do.
3) If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
4) Never use the passive where you can use the active.
5) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent!!!
 
As I was reading through this I couldn’t help but think of the fact that language changes as time does. We study texts such as Shakespeare and many find it difficult to study it due to the words. Also I found it quite ironic that George Orwell has the right to condemn other’s use of language. Couldn’t poetry be described as a man’s rubbish is another’ treasure. I completely understand Orwell’s opinion and reasons why he states what he does, as he devoted his life to literature so it is his passion. It is too often that people put together a range of “big words”, to sound intelligent. I, too, get annoyed by people who try to sound smart but really have no idea what they are saying. I find it quite funny and it reminds me of the upper class of England, “Why, who would like a cup of exquisite tea for dinner”.
In this regard I totally agree with Orwell, but I would say that there is no need to panic as language changes as society does.
 

Week 7

Posted on 2007.09.08 at 13:54
Week 7. b)
 
Describe the impact on you of your favorite piece of writing from either Woolf, Mansfield, or Lawrence.
 
“The Snake” by D. H. Lawrence had a great impact on me and my thoughts. This poem describes humanity to the finest point. It represents our individual actions and thoughts and how we live our lives.
 
In the poem, the facts are that the snake is bad. That Lawrence was taught he must kill the snake. Now he must.
These are the facts but yet Lawrence does not, instead challenging his thoughts and teachings and in the end despising himself. He challenges education directly. He questions himself and his past.
“The voice of my education said to me
He must be killed”.
Yet Lawrence does not intend to carry this out. This got me thinking of others in the world. We often wonder why people act the way they do. I had been the type of person that believed if a person commits murder or a horrific crime then no matter what the person can not have any reasons except for self defense. But yet due to this poem it opened my eyes to the importance of education. Could these people have been educated to act like this? The poem also raises the issue that we are threatened by what we don’t understand. It shows humanity’s strive for more knowledge. If we felt we had learnt all we needed then there would be no more need for new technology or the strive to explain the unknown. Then would we be content and live in harmony. Even Lawrence doesn’t give the answer to this, but he does find peace in the enemy, the snake.
 
Also why do we act in a way that is acceptable to society and if we don’t should we be seen as outsiders. Lawrence challenges this. He is suppose to kill the snake but yet doesn’t. Should we see Lawrence as an outsider for not killing the snake?
“Was it cowardice, that I dared not kill him?
Was it perversity, that I longed to talk to him?
Was it humility, to feel so honoured?
I felt so honoured”
 This raises the issue of do we have the right to judge people because they are not acting as what we consider normal. After all who judges what is normal. Again it related to education. So education affects society’s acceptance of what is normal. So education limits our actions in order to be seen as normal. So education constraints us.
WAIT… That doesn’t seem right!  
But according the Lawrence it makes sense. This is the reason why this poem had such an impact on me.
 
 
 

Comment on Rhiannon’s week 7 poem

Posted on 2007.09.06 at 19:41
Hey. I couldn’t help but link the poem to a person in a relationship that is not sure if they should be in it. Don’t get me wrong it is a lovely poem. As I read it I couldn’t help but think of the various characters on TV that are in relationships were they are in denial in which their husband do not treat them well yet the wife still loves him. It is a very deep poem which explores the inner feelings of the reader. So many people, especially women in relationships, could relate to this. I know this may seem funny but this poem reminds me of a couple of Dr Phil shows I have watched in which they are depressed and in self denial.
 
It is a very nice, simple, poem that makes me sound like a little girl when I think about it. Haha. Na very nice job.
 

Comment on Martha’s week 4

Posted on 2007.08.20 at 11:31
I couldn’t help but nod my head as I read you entry. I totally agree with what you mentioned about Coppola and Conrad in relation to identifying the root of violence.
“In Apocalypse Now this is intensified quite dramatically and showing the horrid aspects of it, in such a way which is indeed inhuman and morally wrong.” This got me thinking that by showing the horrors rather than the glory of war was Coppola’s way to show that war is wrong. This also links with your comment “secondly the fact that the director of apocalypse now has made the violence of war so graphic and detail to the viewers is perhaps suggesting our sense of inhumanness”. I think this is totally acceptable. There are far too many war movies that show the glory of war. I am aware that people committed unspeakable bravery and deserve every recognition they receive, but by unreal war plots tend to support that war is good. I remember watching Black Hawk Down with my family. My mum could not handle the horrors of the war and so had to leave the lounge room. She said “do we have the right to be so proud”.
 
This also links to your comments about innocent people being killed. We see so many innocent people being killed in both the book and movie. In the movie Coppola shows the sacrifices as acceptable in the society but we find it disturbing, thus getting the message that the risk of going to war and killing innocent people far outnumbers the risk of going to war.
 

Week 4

Posted on 2007.08.18 at 12:08
 Week 4. a)
 
Write a detailed description of a landscape that has haunted you as much as the jungles of the Congo or Vietnam haunted Marlow and Willard.
 
As I mentioned in Week 2’s entry I, as a child, would often spend time listening to my grandfather tell me stories when he was a child in the war. While I did not experience this landscape I often imagined it and to this day still do.
 
One landscape was when my grandfather was playing football with his brother on the roof of the Maltese houses. Then the air raid sirens went off and so they ran downstairs and underground into the bunkers. My grandfather got split up from his brother and I wonder how this would feel in a time of such panic. But the landscape that sticks with me is of the underground bunkers. My grandfather said that the underground was a narrow corridor with windows. The ground would shake every time a bomb was dropped on the ground. He said there were dead and injured people all over the place and yet no one could help them. He then told me that as he was running a bomb fell near the bunkers and shattered the window. The lady behind him fell on his back as the windows glass shattered into her back. I often wonder would I even be here if it wasn’t for that lady.
 
But the story gets more gruesome. Underground there were huge doors. Somehow a person’s leg got caught under the door and they had to open the door in order to get into a safer area. So they had no choice but the push the door as hard as possible in order to open it. The door then ripped the leg of the person. Another story was that my grandfather came out from under the bunkers as the air raids finished. He turned around a corner and saw a body torn in half, literally. I remember thinking what I would have done as a child if I saw this.
 
In the year 2000 I went to Malta and saw the country side. I remember seeing the green fields with bushy grass. And I remembered the stories my grandfather told me and could not get the thought that I was stepping on sacred ground, even though the ground was just a grassy downhill slope. These landscapes will forever be with me as long as my memory of my grandfather exists.    

Comment on Anthony's week 2

Posted on 2007.08.05 at 10:35

I totally agree with your comments about Wilfred Owen's  Dulce et Decorum est . I too got the sense of an “orgy of madness”, just by the way Owen wrote in a way of such panic. I found your comments about soldiers as pawns in the war effort as true. It is as if they had no choice but to go over the top or face the humiliation or even the dangers of being shot by their own men.

Your comment about “where has ethical teaching has gone”, is so true even in today’s world. I believe that some leaders of countries have to ask themselves this question as all the past is happening again with such wars as the War in Iraq.  

 


Week 2

Posted on 2007.08.04 at 12:43
Current Mood: thankful

 

Which poem introduced in the first two weeks has left a strong impression on you?

 

The poem that once I read I just had to read again, not so much for analysis, but more for the strongest and touching impression, is The Soldier by Rupert Brooke.

I believe that when one reads or watches war related sources they can have two feelings. One expressing the horrors of war and the other expressing the appreciation of the brave souls that went and took part. The Soldier is in fact showing the appreciation a soldier has on his mother country. The fact that a soldier was so willing to die for his country and even to write about this is a true testament to the bravery of these men and women. 

One line that really stood out was “In that rich earth a richer dust concealed”. This got me thinking of land all over the world where men were turned into dust which consumed the land. While they were fighting for such important land what impressed me was that “a richer dust concealed”. This shows the importance of human life and those that have died fighting for their country.

The soldier in the poem is expressing their love of England and expressing that his bravery was developed from his mother country. His stating why he is willing to die for his country. There is a sense of wanting to experience what he has in the past, just one more time. The stanza that describes England’s beauty brings a sense of reality and hope in a difficult and dangerous situation, and maybe this hope is just what the soldiers may have needed for the courage in each day to face machinery that could end their lives at any time.

This poem touches all emotions of the reader. It begins with patriotism and despair that the soldier knows and accepts that they may die, then appreciation of the land at home and perhaps the longing to see this beautiful land once more, then a sense of calmness with a religious presence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A war poem by Christopher Azzopardi

 

When reading poems about war I cannot help but to think of my nannu (grandfather). When I was a kid I would sit and listen to him recall stories that he experienced during the war when he was a kid in Malta. I was amazed of what he had to experience at such at a young age. So I decided to write a poem about this.

 

Is it just?

 

Is it right what you had to see

The horrors of war, the gore

The stories that you told me

Will forever stay with me

 

For the bravery not only of the soldiers

But the citizens not only of the adults

But of the children.

 

Running from playing football

Straight underground

The sounds of bombs falling

Feeling the ground shake

Running to the strongest point.

 

Would you be alive now

If not for that old women

Whom died when the glass fell

All over her when she stood right behind who?

Would you be alive if not for

That person who had their leg torn off

When caught under the door.

Would I be alive now?

 

But you are and I shall listen

Sit there with anticipation for the next story

Sit in awe of the bravery

Wanting to hear more

Full of admiration

 


Semester 2

Posted on 2007.07.24 at 14:47

Hey everyone. well semester 2 has begun and soon we will have to knuckle down and get into the studying and work. Oh well I was really enjoying sleeping in and a chance to earn some money from work. Just hopefully this semester is fun and interesting.


MY BEST LIVEJOURNAL ENTRIES

Posted on 2007.05.25 at 13:16
Creative Responses

07:10 pm May 8th, 2007


Hey people. Just expressing my thoughts in a poem. Don’t know how it came to me but just got the idea while driving home. A bit weird aye. Anyways….

 

 

How do we see adversities

in our lives

Do we compromise ourselves

or do we transform

Do we see the negative

and feel sorry for ourselves

Do we see the positive

and grow within.

 

How do we undertake

the task of life

Do we let life flow

and take whatever lies ahead

Or do we plan for every feature

in order not to be lost

Are we scared of the future

or eager for new challenges.

 

What is really important

to us in our lives

Is it financial achievements

or materialistic accomplishments

Is it more emotional and spiritual

or is it expressing love to others

 

Our choices are crucial

in our lives

We take adversities

as we will

We take life

as we will

We take importance

as we will

It is our will that

shapes our lives.

Critical Comments

11:24 am May 23rd, 2007


“Now I find hidden away in my nature something that tells me that nothing in the whole world is meaningless, and suffering least of all” (Wilde 1742)

 

When I read this quote I was instantly inspired and found a new respect for Wilde. After all the hardships Wilde faces he maintains the ability to believe in the above quote and keep faith. For him to have the realization of this quote shows his personality and integrity. This I found linked with “that the two great turning points in my life were when my father sent me to Oxford, and when society sent me to prison” (Wilde 1743). It is just remarkable how someone can have this idea despite society sending him to prison for expressing his views. Here we see that his father sent him to Oxford and society sent him to prison yet these are the turning points in his life. One could see these, especially prison, as a totally demising of the human spirit yet Wilde sees this as a building of the human spirit.

 

Wilde begins this passage with the quote “And the end of it all is that I have got to forgive you. I must do so” (Wilde 1740). From this quote Wilde seems almost Jesus like, telling us we are forgiven. It now seems that we as readers are in the wrong and have had a personal impact on Wilde’s life and the reasoning why he was degraded in prison away from society.

 

To an extent Wilde is similar to Ivan Illych. Both were in a similar position. Wilde locked up from society relying on others to bring him his physical needs, as with Ilych. Both to an extent reach their fullness in such harsh personal times and it seems one need to be put in such a position in order to find themselves. While Ivan does attempt to reach his fulfillment completely Wilde does it completely and recognizes this ability much earlier. Wilde could have waited to the completely last moment but yet when he is put in prison he initially turns it into a positive “the evil things of my life to good” (Wilde 1743).

Reviews of LiveJournal entries by other literature students at ACU".

01:50 pm April 28th, 2007


Hey anthony

 

I believe you have raised a view not only relevant to both Tolstoy and Dickens but to life in general. How do we begin to answer the question

What life is really about? What do we want out of it?

 

I believe that here is the issue of personal opinion and what each individual truly believes in. Even faith can provide some with answers they may be searching for.

 

I found it interesting about your comments on listening. There is no doubting that both Geraism and Stephen Blackpool both become one with themselves through listening to others. You hit the nail on the head when you state

We're all so caught up in getting the marks we need, making x amount of dollars, seeking success, overall 'being' something, but not necessarily being someone WE want to be.

We  have to try and shift away from this moulding of social expectations and brace what is truly important in life. We should try to have some characteristics that Geraism has in order to listen to the dying Ivan Ilych and by this listening make Ivan’s last moments a bit more enjoyable.

 

I too found it quite remarkable that Tolstoy has the ability to make a character that has such wealth and success have a broken spirit while a character that is poor and have such a large and welcoming spirit. I guess this portrays the message that money doesn’t make people happy. It is ironic that the powerful and mighty cling to the poor when they are helpless as other mighty people are no where to be seen. A person’s integrity needs to be based on fulfilling themselves rather than others but yet putting others before themselves. Geraism had the ability to do this in his integrity and thus is the character that us readers strive and wish to be like.  

 

You are not wrong in stating all those verbs in order to attempt to explain what life is about. If all people attempted to do those things we wouldn’t have half the violence we have in today’s world. It is true that to say things is easier than to act them but it is possible and we as humans should try and attempt this.


Week 12 Oscar Wilde

Posted on 2007.05.23 at 11:24

“Now I find hidden away in my nature something that tells me that nothing in the whole world is meaningless, and suffering least of all” (Wilde 1742)

 

When I read this quote I was instantly inspired and found a new respect for Wilde. After all the hardships Wilde faces he maintains the ability to believe in the above quote and keep faith. For him to have the realization of this quote shows his personality and integrity. This I found linked with “that the two great turning points in my life were when my father sent me to Oxford, and when society sent me to prison” (Wilde 1743). It is just remarkable how someone can have this idea despite society sending him to prison for expressing his views. Here we see that his father sent him to Oxford and society sent him to prison yet these are the turning points in his life. One could see these, especially prison, as a totally demising of the human spirit yet Wilde sees this as a building of the human spirit.

 

Wilde begins this passage with the quote “And the end of it all is that I have got to forgive you. I must do so” (Wilde 1740). From this quote Wilde seems almost Jesus like, telling us we are forgiven. It now seems that we as readers are in the wrong and have had a personal impact on Wilde’s life and the reasoning why he was degraded in prison away from society.

 

To an extent Wilde is similar to Ivan Illych. Both were in a similar position. Wilde locked up from society relying on others to bring him his physical needs, as with Ilych. Both to an extent reach their fullness in such harsh personal times and it seems one need to be put in such a position in order to find themselves. While Ivan does attempt to reach his fulfillment completely Wilde does it completely and recognizes this ability much earlier. Wilde could have waited to the completely last moment but yet when he is put in prison he initially turns it into a positive “the evil things of my life to good” (Wilde 1743).


FA Cup Final

Posted on 2007.05.22 at 17:06
Current Mood: angry

well another fa cup final has past this year. oh yeah for those that dont know the fa cup final is the most prestige football knockout competition in england and arguably the most prestige domestic comp. well i am a manchester united supporter and will always be one. and we lost in extra time with six minutes left. we also had a goal disallowed which clearly shows that ball over the line. so as any other man u supporter i decided to write a poem to express my anger :)

oh yeah and we lost to the team we most hate: chelsea

To support with great passion

a team that you love

to strive to reach the greatness

of years gone by.

Now its time to shine in front of many

to represent those in other countries.

A great cheer is heard

as the game bigger than itself starts.

Two rival teams

head to head

in more than just a game.

Both try to get in front

though none succeed.

The ball crosses the line

and a lot cheer

only for there to be no goal

But how can it be?

Is this not fair

A disappointment is experienced by many

but relief by some.

Now there is extra-time

another half hour for us to cheer

Six minutes left and there is a goal

disappointment I feel

the sense of a loss.

If only the earlier goal had stood

we would be champions.

But now we are not.

Despite a loss we are proud

for we are loyal and

there is always next year  

 

 

 


Poem

Posted on 2007.05.08 at 19:10
Current Mood: calm

Hey people. Just expressing my thoughts in a poem. Don’t know how it came to me but just got the idea while driving home. A bit weird aye. Anyways….

 

 

How do we see adversities

in our lives

Do we compromise ourselves

or do we transform

Do we see the negative

and feel sorry for ourselves

Do we see the positive

and grow within.

 

How do we undertake

the task of life

Do we let life flow

and take whatever lies ahead

Or do we plan for every feature

in order not to be lost

Are we scared of the future

or eager for new challenges.

 

What is really important

to us in our lives

Is it financial achievements

or materialistic accomplishments

Is it more emotional and spiritual

or is it expressing love to others

 

Our choices are crucial

in our lives

We take adversities

as we will

We take life

as we will

We take importance

as we will

It is our will that

shapes our lives.


Comment on Anthony's week 8

Posted on 2007.04.28 at 13:50

Hey anthony

 

I believe you have raised a view not only relevant to both Tolstoy and Dickens but to life in general. How do we begin to answer the question

What life is really about? What do we want out of it?

 

I believe that here is the issue of personal opinion and what each individual truly believes in. Even faith can provide some with answers they may be searching for.

 

I found it interesting about your comments on listening. There is no doubting that both Geraism and Stephen Blackpool both become one with themselves through listening to others. You hit the nail on the head when you state

We're all so caught up in getting the marks we need, making x amount of dollars, seeking success, overall 'being' something, but not necessarily being someone WE want to be.

We  have to try and shift away from this moulding of social expectations and brace what is truly important in life. We should try to have some characteristics that Geraism has in order to listen to the dying Ivan Ilych and by this listening make Ivan’s last moments a bit more enjoyable.

 

I too found it quite remarkable that Tolstoy has the ability to make a character that has such wealth and success have a broken spirit while a character that is poor and have such a large and welcoming spirit. I guess this portrays the message that money doesn’t make people happy. It is ironic that the powerful and mighty cling to the poor when they are helpless as other mighty people are no where to be seen. A person’s integrity needs to be based on fulfilling themselves rather than others but yet putting others before themselves. Geraism had the ability to do this in his integrity and thus is the character that us readers strive and wish to be like.  

 

You are not wrong in stating all those verbs in order to attempt to explain what life is about. If all people attempted to do those things we wouldn’t have half the violence we have in today’s world. It is true that to say things is easier than to act them but it is possible and we as humans should try and attempt this.


Week 5

Posted on 2007.03.28 at 18:16
Current Mood: touched

Well what a beautiful poem we read in the tutorials. It was by Percy Shelly called “To a Sky Lark”. I actually thought it was the best poem we have read all year.

 

Each stanza seemed to paint a picture, and it was written in a way that everyone could understand and take in the beautiful language and its imagery.

 

What got my attention the most in the poem was the sense of freedom. The bird could do what it wished and was not restained by the controlling society or the norms. We see this by “Blithe Spirit”.

 

Then Percy Shelly begs the bird to teach him its way of life, “Teach me half the gladness that they brain must know”. Honestly this poem was such fun to disect, due to the fact as we did we learnt how much more the descriptive language goes.  

 


Week 4

Posted on 2007.03.21 at 16:15

So we went to the art gallery for the second time and to be honest it was a good break instead of attending the lecture and tutorial. Again i was intrigued by some of the paintings while others were just weird, but wonderful in their own way. I was mostly attracted to the painting by Eugene Von Guerard called Milford Sound.


 


This painting contained such a beautiful landscape which would relax anyone who looked and analysed its beauty. It made me think of what the painters must go through to find the inspiration for their works.


 


Oh yeah by the way there are some weird people out there that catch public transport. Some bloke was walking up and down the carriage yelling I am going to get my mate who just got out of prison to kill you and stuff like that. But he was talking to himself so yeah, pretty weird. But the art gallery was good in a sense that it seems to exist without the weird and wonderful things that go on in the world


 



Week 3

Posted on 2007.03.15 at 19:28
Current Mood: hopeful

Alright people I decided to write a poem this week. Basically I was inspired by walking to the car from uni and decided to write a poem about humanity, so here it goes:

 

Are we right or wrong

to strive in making the unknown obvious,

in making the uncontrollable controlled,

in making the impenetrable fragile.

Are we right in wanting to know,

in continuous search

for something always further.

Are we right in expanding our reach

in creating creations

in being intrusive for others’ benefit.

Are we right to mould solids

to suit us.

In the end are we right

in wanting to be

Kings of our domain.  


Week 1

Posted on 2007.02.27 at 18:10

Well uni has started again, and so has literature. It already seems that we have been at uni for weeks with all the explaining we are getting and looking through relating to our assignments.

 

Literature doesn’t seem half bad (so far). I was actually quite interested in the lecture about prudence and passion. It seems that some poets became poets as a means of rebelling and yet fulfillment. It seems unfair that to become a poet was seen as radical, I guess we would all be seen as radicals if they read our live journal.

 

Anyway its good to be back and I hope literature stays as interesting as what it was today.

 


Advertisement

Customize